![]() |
| Source: cliffmass.blogspot.com |
This one I happened to see on Scientific American blog and is quite interesting. Starting from a comment on an Onion News (Satirical News Emag) article on 27 new functions in trigonometry, author Dr. Evelyn Lamb, University of Utah introduces to 10 unheard functions of trigonometry.
After such a long time I came by some superb blog on trigonometric function and log scales, maths to be precise. It
reminded me of my school days, thanks to my father when he used to ask us to solve trig and
log problems via conventional means i.e. using log tables
and papers. Feeling proud of the fact that I still know how to make my
own trig table out of nothing. I don’t know if our calculator/computer
dependent generation has any idea how much fun is math.
Here is an excerpt from the blog,
“We’re very lucky now that we can multiply, square, and take square
roots so easily, and our calculators can store precise information about
the sines, cosines, and tangents of angles, but before we could do
that, we figured out a work-around in the form of a ridiculous number of
trig functions. It’s easy forget that the people who defined them were
not sadistic math teachers who want people to memorize weird functions
for no reason. These functions actually made computations quicker and
less error-prone. Now that computers are so powerful, the haversine has
gone the way of the floppy disc.”
“Our DNA-based fabrication method is highly scalable, offers high
resolution and low manufacturing cost. All these
advantages make the method very attractive for industrial adoption.”
Here is a link to the history of teleportation experiments, explaining the quantum entanglement process by Captain Kirk’s example.
In performing the experiment, the Caltech group was able to get around the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle,
the main barrier for teleportation of objects larger than a photon.
This principle states that you cannot simultaneously know the location
and the speed of a particle. But if you can’t know the position of a
particle, then how can you teleport it? In order to teleport a photon
without violating the Heisenberg Principle, the Caltech physicists used a
phenomenon known as entanglement. In entanglement, at least three photons are needed to achieve quantum teleportation:
- Photon A: The photon to be teleported
- Photon B: The transporting photon
- Photon C: The photon that is entangled with photon B
If
researchers tried to look too closely at photon A without entanglement,
they would bump it, and thereby change it. By entangling photons B and
C, researchers can extract some information about photon A, and the
remaining information would be passed on to B by way of entanglement,
and then on to photon C. When researchers apply the information from
photon A to photon C, they can create an exact replica of photon A.
However, photon A no longer exists as it did before the information was
sent to photon C.
In other words, when Captain Kirk beams down to
an alien planet, an analysis of his atomic structure is passed through
the transporter room to his desired location, where a replica of Kirk is
created and the original is destroyed.
Read the news of 100% teleportation over here and the excerpted article over here.
4. Ages Old Glass Structure Myths Explained (Source: Science Alert)
![]() |
| On the right is the structure that Zachariasen postulated in 1932, while the left one is the real SEM image of glass structure, discovered 2013 |
longstanding theoretical representation of the arrangement of atoms in
glass. And guess what this is going for Guiness world records as the thinnest glass ever. There is a great potential for this discovery in the future of semiconductors as the author explains,
What’s more, two-dimensional glass could someday find a use in
transistors, by providing a defect-free, ultra-thin material that could
improve, for example, the performance of processors in computers and
smartphones.
6. The Mad Scientist’s Laser Beams
Mad scientists completely bust the myth of Death Rays and Opponent Vaporiser Guns using Thermodynamics, interesting? I had tried to bust Agha Waqar’s Water Kit fraud the same way sometimes back over here. See what they have to say,
“First, consider the true
vaporization–the complete separation of all atoms within a molecule–of
water. With a simple molecular structure containing an oxygen atom
bonded to two hydrogen atoms, it takes serious energy to break these
bonds. In fact, it takes 460 kilojoules of energy to break just one mole
of oxygen-hydrogen bonds—around the same energy that a 2,000-pound car
going 70 miles per hour on the highway has in potential. And that’s just
18 grams of water! So as you can see, it would take a gargantuan amount
of energy to separate all the atoms in even a small glass of
water…especially if that glass of water is your analog for a person.
The human body is a bit more complicated
than a glass of water, but it still vaporizes like one. And thanks to
our spies spread across scientific organizations, we now have the energy
required to turn a human into an atomic soup, to break all the atomic
bonds in a body. According to the captured study, it takes around three gigajoules of death-ray to entirely vaporize a person—enough to completely melt 5,000 pounds of steel or simulate a lightning bolt. ZAP!
With such an energy requirement—difficult to get from even top-of-the-line atomizers—it
may be more efficient for the successful mad scientist to instead
settle for the other kind of vaporization: turning a target into gas.”
and
“As it would take more than 70 of the world’s most powerful lasers
combined to vaporize the water of just one person, death ray energy
conservation is paramount. Remember: A successful mad scientist is as
efficient as she is devious.”
So forget being Vector or Gru. It is highly energy consuming method. 🙂 Read the full article for more interesting facts.
7. The Uggliest Specie
![]() |
| Imagine how would it taste. 😛 |
Join my fb page “NANOTECHNOLOGY PAKISTAN” for more updates and reviews on Science.




Leave a Reply